All of the main actions are accessible via menu items at the top of the screen.Having said that, Navicat's interface is cleaner and more intuitive, IMHO. There can be little doubt that both products have well designed GUIs. Here are side-by-side screen captures of DBeaver and Navicat main screens in Windows:

Perhaps visual appearance is not the first thing one thinks of when considering application features, but how an application's GUI looks can tell us a lot about what kind of user experience (UX) it provides. But, as the saying goes, 'the devil is in the details', so, while the two products may seem similar at first glance, a closer examination of each tool's Visual Appeal, Secure Connectivity, and NoSQL Support will reveal that the differences between the two far outnumber any apparent similarities.

Moreover, both are compatible with cloud databases as well, such as Amazon RDS, Amazon Aurora, Amazon Redshift, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud, Google Cloud and MongoDB Atlas. DBeaver vs Navicat: Visual Appeal, Secure Connectivity, and NoSQL Support by Robert Gravelleīoth DBeaver and Navicat are Universal Database Tools, which means that they support all popular databases, including MySQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, SQL Server, Oracle, PostgreSQL, and SQLite.

Sqlite dbeaver